{"id":1276,"date":"2020-04-01T12:40:00","date_gmt":"2020-04-01T12:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jenaexperiment.uni-jena.de\/?p=1276"},"modified":"2020-08-05T10:47:38","modified_gmt":"2020-08-05T10:47:38","slug":"new-publication-from-ebeling-et-al-in-ecology-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/2020\/04\/01\/new-publication-from-ebeling-et-al-in-ecology-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"New publication from Ebeling et al in Ecology: Contrasting effects of plant diversity on \u03b2\u2010 and \u03b3\u2010diversity of grassland invertebrates"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-vivid-cyan-blue-background-color has-background-dim has-parallax\" style=\"background-image:url(\/wp-content\/uploads\/bg4.png);min-height:140px\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p style=\"font-size:24px\" class=\"has-text-align-center\">Contrasting effects of plant diversity on \u03b2\u2010 and \u03b3\u2010diversity of grassland invertebrates<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h3>Abstract:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignright is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/image-e1596028298474.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1262\" width=\"282\" height=\"252\" srcset=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/image-e1596028298474.png 714w, \/wp-content\/uploads\/image-e1596028298474-300x268.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 282px) 100vw, 282px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"justify\">The diversity of primary producers strongly affects the structure and  diversity of species assemblages at other trophic levels. However,  limited knowledge exists of how plant diversity effects at small spatial  scales propagate to consumer communities at larger spatial scales. We  assessed arthropod community \u03b2 and \u03b3\u2010diversity in response to  experimentally manipulated plant community richness in two long\u2010term  grassland biodiversity experiments (Jena, Germany and Cedar Creek, USA)  replicated over two years. We calculated arthropod species   turnover   among all plot combinations (\u03b2\u2010diversity), and accumulated   number of   arthropod species occurring on (1) all pairwise plot   combinations and   (2) 40 randomly selected six\u2010plot   combinations&nbsp;(\u03b3\u2010diversity). The   components of arthropod diversity were   tested against two measures of   plant diversity, namely average plant   \u03b1\u2010diversity (PSR) and the average  difference in plant \u03b1\u2010diversity   between plots (\u0394PSR). Whereas PSR points  to the overall importance of   plant \u03b1\u2010diversity for arthropod  community  turnover and diversity on a   larger scale, \u0394PSR represents the  role of  habitat heterogeneity. We   demonstrate that arthropod \u03b3\u2010diversity  is  supported by high,   homogeneous plant \u03b1\u2010diversity, despite lower   arthropod \u03b2\u2010diversity   among high\u2010 compared to low\u2010diversity plant   communities. We also show   that, in six\u2010plot combinations, average plant   \u03b1\u2010diversity has a   positive influence on arthropod \u03b3\u2010diversity only when   homogeneity in   plant \u03b1\u2010diversity is also high. Varying heterogeneity  in  six\u2010plot   combinations showed that combinations consisting solely of   plots with   an intermediate level of plant \u03b1\u2010diversity support a higher   number of   arthropod species compared to combinations that contain a mix   of  high\u2010  and low\u2010diversity plots. In fact, equal levels of arthropod    diversity  were found for six\u2010plot combinations with only intermediate  or   high  plant \u03b1\u2010diversity, due to saturating benefits of local and     larger\u2010scale plant diversity for higher trophic levels. Our results,     alongside those of recent observational studies, strongly suggest that     maintaining high \u03b1\u2010diversity in plant communities is important for     conserving multiple components of arthropod diversity. As arthropods     carry out a range of essential ecosystem functions, such as pollination     and natural pest\u2010control, our findings provide crucial insight for     effective planning of human\u2010dominated landscapes to maximize both     ecological and economic benefits in grassland systems.    <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/bg4.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1308\" width=\"674\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/bg4.png 848w, \/wp-content\/uploads\/bg4-300x100.png 300w, \/wp-content\/uploads\/bg4-768x257.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 674px) 100vw, 674px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Reference:<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Ebeling, A., E. W. Lind, S. T. Meyer, A. D. Barnes, E. T. Borer, N. Eisenhauer, et al. 2020. Contrasting effects of plant diversity on beta- and gamma-diversity of grassland invertebrates. <em>Ecology<\/em> <strong>101<\/strong>:e03057. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ecy.3057\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ecy.3057<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract: The diversity of primary producers strongly affects the structure and diversity of species assemblages at other trophic levels. However, limited knowledge exists of how plant diversity effects at small&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1682,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[15,13],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1276"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1276"}],"version-history":[{"count":32,"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1276\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1679,"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1276\/revisions\/1679"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/the-jena-experiment.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}